Monday, June 12, 2006

Bolton makes the UN lovers cry.

UN: Excellent, people like Mallaby are internationalists who think it would be kewl for America to bow down to the UN. They just hate the fact someone like Bolton is there holding the UN's feet to the fire.

"Last month President Bush issued a rare apology. "Saying 'Bring it on,' kind of tough talk, you know, that sent the wrong signal," he confessed. "I think in certain parts of the world it was misinterpreted." Well done, Mr. President, you've understood that bluster can backfire. Now how about sharing this insight with your ambassador to the United Nations? ....Not many reformers at the United Nations believe that the budget threat achieved anything. To the contrary, Bolton has so poisoned the atmosphere that the cause of management renewal is viewed by many developing countries as an American plot. And if Bolton carries through on his threat to cut off money for the United Nations, the United States will be more isolated than ever. Refusing to fund U.N. officials who are planning for a peacekeeping mission in Darfur is not a winning strategy."
America will be isolated in the UN? We are the United Nations. It can't function without our money and unless the management reforms are carried out, even Japan will hold their dues as punishment. Bolton is what is needed at the UN now, not some go along pansy with dreams of Kofi handing out awards for being a world citizen at some point.
Last week the U.N. deputy secretary general, a pro-American Briton named Mark Malloch Brown, went public with his Bolton frustrations. He pointed out that the United Nations serves many American objectives, from deploying peacekeepers to helping with Iraq's elections. Given this cooperation, the powers that be in Washington should stick up for the United Nations rather than threatening to blow it up. They should not be passive in the face of "unchecked U.N.-bashing and stereotyping." This merely stated the obvious. If you doubt that U.N.-bashing and stereotyping goes on, ask yourself what gallery Bolton is playing to -- or check out the latest cover of the National Rifle Association magazine, which features a wolf with U.N. logos in its eyeballs. But Malloch Brown's speech didn't seem obvious to Bolton. "This is the worst mistake by a senior U.N. official that I have seen," he thundered in response. "Even though the target of the speech was the United States, the victim, I fear, will be the United Nations." Which would suit Bolton and his allies perfectly. But it should not suit Bush, at least not now that he's grasped that bluster can backfire. Arriving at the U.N. summit last September, a different Bush greeted the secretary general and gestured at Bolton; "has the place blown up since he's been here?" he demanded, teasingly. Well, it's now time for the new Bush to acknowledge that Bolton's tactics aren't funny. The United States needs an ambassador who can work with the United Nations. Right now, it doesn't have one.
Mallaby mistakes Bush's semi-apology for "bring it on" talk is somehow going to translate to him soften his stance on the United Nations, an ineffective, bloated entity of wannabe unelected people who believe they are defacto world leaders. Wrong. Either the UN changes or it dies a slow death. Bolton is not the one in trouble here much to Mallaby's dismay.

Copyright Narbosa 1998-2006
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by